Just because they say you should… doesn’t mean you actually should.
There’s a dangerous trend in cloud operations — one supercharged by AI tools that push you to “just click and go.”
AWS Trusted Advisor says do X…
Azure Advisor says enable Y…
SOC 2 says enforce Z…
CIS, NIST, ISO, PCI… it never ends.
And while these recommendations are well-intentioned, it all comes back to something my dad used to say when I was a kid:
“If your friends jumped off a cliff, would you do it too?”
At 10 years old, it annoyed me.
Somewhere around creeping up on 50 — deep in the world of navigating cloud chaos — that advice suddenly makes perfect sense.
Blindly following every AWS/Azure/compliance suggestion… without questioning it… is the cloud version of walking right off that proverbial cliff.
If something is 100% required, critical for protection, or truly essential? Go for it. No hesitation.
But that’s rarely the case.
Most recommendations fall into a big grey area where the value is unclear.
That’s where you need to think — not click.
Cloud maturity isn’t about doing everything.
It’s about doing the right things.
The Problem:
Over-Engineering Masquerading as Best Practices
Cloud platforms and compliance frameworks create a subtle pressure to say yes to everything:
Yes… enable the toggle
Yes… turn on the extra encryption
Yes… expand the retention period
Yes… deploy Multi-AZ everywhere
Yes… replicate across regions
Yes… adopt every SOC 2 control “just in case”
Individually harmless.
Collectively?
A ballooning, expensive, noisy environment.
This is how teams end up with systems that look “perfect” to auditors and dashboards… while draining budgets and adding zero business value.
A Real EverythingCloud Story:
Oversized Infrastructure Gone Wild
A few months ago, EverythingCloud stepped into an AWS environment shaped by years of well-intentioned “best practice” checklists… basically a contender for Most Compliant Cloud Ever.
When we asked the team why everything was turned on, the answer was always:
“Because that’s what AWS recommends…”
“Because Trusted Advisor flagged it…”
“Because SOC 2 says so…”
(Not to pick on AWS — Azure does the same thing. Compliance FOMO is real 🙂)
Here’s what we actually found — and yes, it was that big:
-
Seventy-three EC2 instances running 24/7, including workloads used only a few hours a day
-
Forty-six RDS clusters, all Multi-AZ, powering internal tools with almost zero downtime impact
-
Petabytes of logs stored indefinitely because “SOC 2 wants log retention”
-
Four different security agents on every EC2 instance because each framework suggested its own
-
Cross-region replication enabled for nearly everything — even workloads untouched for months
-
Backups running hourly across hundreds of EBS volumes, even though the data changed weekly
-
A fully-provisioned DR environment costing thousands per month… that hadn’t been tested in over a year
It was the cloud equivalent of wearing five helmets, three seatbelts, and a parachute to ride a bike.
My dad’s cliff-jumping line echoed in my head.
AWS doesn’t know your business.
Azure doesn’t know your workload patterns.
Compliance frameworks don’t know your actual risk tolerance.
And AI definitely doesn’t know your context — at least not yet.
The Insight:
Best Practices Are Menus, Not Mandatory Checklists
Best practices are suggestions — not commandments.
The real question isn’t what AWS recommends.
It’s:
“What is the business value of doing this?”
If the value is unclear or nonexistent…
you’re burning money, not reducing risk.
Examples:
-
Multi-AZ for internal tools with $0 downtime cost
-
Hourly backups for workloads updated once a week
-
Cross-region replication without regulatory need
-
Retaining logs indefinitely without compliance requirements
-
Stacking multiple security agents because each framework expects one
This is the cloud’s version of following your friends straight off the cliff.
How EverythingCloud Fixed It (The Right Way)
We implemented a context-aware architecture strategy aligned with real-world FinOps principles:
Selective Compliance
Mapped SOC 2, CIS, and NIST to actual business context — adopting controls that mattered, skipping those that didn’t.
Right-Sized Reliability
Critical workloads stayed Multi-AZ.
Internal and low-impact workloads moved to single-AZ with automated restore.
Backup Policies That Actually Make Sense
Daily for daily-changing systems.
Weekly for low-change workloads.
Hourly only where truly needed.
Rationalized Security Tools
One tool per requirement — not four.
Less noise. Less cost. More clarity.
Intentional Decision-Making
We replaced the “turn everything green” culture with thoughtful, evidence-backed decisions.
Results:
Immediate Wins, Zero Risk
Within a few weeks:
-
41% cost reduction
-
Dramatically fewer alerts
-
Cleaner audit posture
-
Lower operational overhead
-
No loss of resilience
-
Zero increase in security risk
-
A team that finally understood the why behind each decision
The surprising part?
They became more compliant after we removed half the stuff.
Because compliance isn’t about doing everything.
It’s about doing the right things — and being able to explain why.
The Real Silent Killer in Cloud Architecture
It’s not AWS.
It’s not Azure.
It’s not AI.
It’s not SOC 2.
It’s blindly doing what you’re told without thinking.
Cloud maturity comes from intentional decisions — not default toggles.
Or as my dad would say:
“If your friends jumped off a cliff, would you do it too?”
In the cloud, the answer should always be no.
But if there’s a lake on the other side of that cliff?
Heck yeah — I’m jumping.
Just not with my cloud architecture.
If you’re wondering whether your cloud is full of hidden “shoulds,” we’re happy to help you find out.
-d
